Basketball Boys Rankings (12/19)
- Thread starter Alum-Ni
- Start date
Composite rankings
CLASS A
1. Millard North (3) (5-0) - 30 pts
2. Bellevue West (4-1) - 26
3. Omaha Westside (5-0) - 25
4. Papillion-LaVista South (6-0) - 21
5. Omaha Creighton Prep (5-1) - 17
6. Gretna (5-1) - 16
7t. Kearney (4-2) - 8
7t. Omaha Bryan (5-1) - 8
7t. Omaha Central (5-1) - 8
10t. Omaha North (5-1) - 3
10t. Omaha Westview (4-2) - 3
Contenders
(none)
==============================
CLASS B
1. Crete (3) (6-0) - 30 pts
2. Elkhorn (5-0) - 27
3. Norris (5-1) - 23
4. Omaha Skutt (4-1) - 21
5. Bennington (3-2) - 16
6. Scottsbluff (5-1) - 15
7. Elkhorn North (3-2) - 13
8. Omaha Roncalli (3-2) - 9
9. Platteview (5-2) - 7
10. Blair (4-2) - 3
Contenders
Elkhorn Mt. Michael (3-3) - 1
==============================
CLASS C1
1. Ashland-Greenwood (3) (5-0) - 30 pts
2t. Auburn (4-0) - 24
2t. Ogallala (7-0) - 24
4. Wahoo (5-1) - 23
5. Omaha Concordia (4-1) - 19
6. Douglas County West (4-0) - 15
7. Wahoo Neumann (6-0) - 10
8. Central City (6-1) - 7
9t. Doniphan-Trumbull (4-1) - 4
9t. Sidney (6-0) - 4
Contenders
Adams Central (6-1) - 3
Fillmore Central (6-0) - 2
==============================
CLASS C2
1. Amherst (3) (5-0) - 30 pts
2. Lincoln Lutheran (6-0) - 24
3. Lutheran High Northeast (7-0) - 21
4. Hartington Cedar Catholic (3-1) - 19
5. Tri County (4-0) - 15
6. Sandy Creek (6-0) - 14
7. Freeman (4-2) - 12
8. Elkhorn Valley (7-0) - 11
9. Ponca (6-0) - 8
10t. Cross County (4-2) - 4
10t. Grand Island Central Catholic (3-3) - 4
Contenders
Norfolk Catholic (3-3) - 3
==============================
CLASS D1
1. Johnson-Brock (3) (5-0) - 30 pts
2t. Howells-Dodge (7-1) - 24
2t. North Platte St. Patrick's (5-2) - 24
4. Dundy County-Stratton (5-1) - 21
5. Ansley/Litchfield (6-0) - 18
6. Ainsworth (5-1) - 17
7. McCool Junction (4-1) - 11
8t. Bloomfield (6-2) - 5
8t. South Loup (4-1) - 5
10. Guardian Angels Central Catholic (3-3) - 4
Contenders
Humphrey/Lindsay Holy Family (3-3) - 3
Cambridge (5-2) - 2
Plainview (4-3) - 1
==============================
CLASS D2
1. Shelton (3) (6-0) - 30 pts
2. Wynot (5-1) - 26
3. Parkview Christian (5-0) - 24
4. Osceola (5-2) - 18
5. Falls City Sacred Heart (4-0) - 17
6t. Maywood/Hayes Center (6-1) - 14
6t. Walthill (6-0) - 14
8. O'Neill St. Mary's (6-0) - 12
9. Sandhills/Thedford (6-0) - 7
10. Hyannis (6-0) - 2
Contenders
Nebraska Lutheran (5-0)
CLASS A
1. Millard North (3) (5-0) - 30 pts
2. Bellevue West (4-1) - 26
3. Omaha Westside (5-0) - 25
4. Papillion-LaVista South (6-0) - 21
5. Omaha Creighton Prep (5-1) - 17
6. Gretna (5-1) - 16
7t. Kearney (4-2) - 8
7t. Omaha Bryan (5-1) - 8
7t. Omaha Central (5-1) - 8
10t. Omaha North (5-1) - 3
10t. Omaha Westview (4-2) - 3
Contenders
(none)
==============================
CLASS B
1. Crete (3) (6-0) - 30 pts
2. Elkhorn (5-0) - 27
3. Norris (5-1) - 23
4. Omaha Skutt (4-1) - 21
5. Bennington (3-2) - 16
6. Scottsbluff (5-1) - 15
7. Elkhorn North (3-2) - 13
8. Omaha Roncalli (3-2) - 9
9. Platteview (5-2) - 7
10. Blair (4-2) - 3
Contenders
Elkhorn Mt. Michael (3-3) - 1
==============================
CLASS C1
1. Ashland-Greenwood (3) (5-0) - 30 pts
2t. Auburn (4-0) - 24
2t. Ogallala (7-0) - 24
4. Wahoo (5-1) - 23
5. Omaha Concordia (4-1) - 19
6. Douglas County West (4-0) - 15
7. Wahoo Neumann (6-0) - 10
8. Central City (6-1) - 7
9t. Doniphan-Trumbull (4-1) - 4
9t. Sidney (6-0) - 4
Contenders
Adams Central (6-1) - 3
Fillmore Central (6-0) - 2
==============================
CLASS C2
1. Amherst (3) (5-0) - 30 pts
2. Lincoln Lutheran (6-0) - 24
3. Lutheran High Northeast (7-0) - 21
4. Hartington Cedar Catholic (3-1) - 19
5. Tri County (4-0) - 15
6. Sandy Creek (6-0) - 14
7. Freeman (4-2) - 12
8. Elkhorn Valley (7-0) - 11
9. Ponca (6-0) - 8
10t. Cross County (4-2) - 4
10t. Grand Island Central Catholic (3-3) - 4
Contenders
Norfolk Catholic (3-3) - 3
==============================
CLASS D1
1. Johnson-Brock (3) (5-0) - 30 pts
2t. Howells-Dodge (7-1) - 24
2t. North Platte St. Patrick's (5-2) - 24
4. Dundy County-Stratton (5-1) - 21
5. Ansley/Litchfield (6-0) - 18
6. Ainsworth (5-1) - 17
7. McCool Junction (4-1) - 11
8t. Bloomfield (6-2) - 5
8t. South Loup (4-1) - 5
10. Guardian Angels Central Catholic (3-3) - 4
Contenders
Humphrey/Lindsay Holy Family (3-3) - 3
Cambridge (5-2) - 2
Plainview (4-3) - 1
==============================
CLASS D2
1. Shelton (3) (6-0) - 30 pts
2. Wynot (5-1) - 26
3. Parkview Christian (5-0) - 24
4. Osceola (5-2) - 18
5. Falls City Sacred Heart (4-0) - 17
6t. Maywood/Hayes Center (6-1) - 14
6t. Walthill (6-0) - 14
8. O'Neill St. Mary's (6-0) - 12
9. Sandhills/Thedford (6-0) - 7
10. Hyannis (6-0) - 2
Contenders
Nebraska Lutheran (5-0)
Remaining Boys Undefeated Teams
CLASS A
Millard North (5-0)
Papillion-LaVista South (7-0)
CLASS B
Crete (7-0)
Elkhorn (5-0)
CLASS C1
Ashland-Greenwood (6-0)
Auburn (4-0)
Conestoga (5-0)
Cozad (6-0)
Douglas County West (5-0)
Fillmore Central (7-0)
Ogallala (7-0)
Sidney (7-0)
Wahoo Neumann (7-0)
CLASS C2
Alma (8-0)
Elkhorn Valley (7-0)
Lincoln Lutheran (7-0)
Lutheran High Northeast (8-0)
Ponca (6-0)
Summerland (7-0)
CLASS D1
Ansley/Litchfield (7-0)
Johnson-Brock (6-0)
CLASS D2
Hay Springs (7-0)
Hyannis (7-0)
Shelton (7-0)
Walthill (7-0)
CLASS A
Millard North (5-0)
Papillion-LaVista South (7-0)
CLASS B
Crete (7-0)
Elkhorn (5-0)
CLASS C1
Ashland-Greenwood (6-0)
Auburn (4-0)
Conestoga (5-0)
Cozad (6-0)
Douglas County West (5-0)
Fillmore Central (7-0)
Ogallala (7-0)
Sidney (7-0)
Wahoo Neumann (7-0)
CLASS C2
Alma (8-0)
Elkhorn Valley (7-0)
Lincoln Lutheran (7-0)
Lutheran High Northeast (8-0)
Ponca (6-0)
Summerland (7-0)
CLASS D1
Ansley/Litchfield (7-0)
Johnson-Brock (6-0)
CLASS D2
Hay Springs (7-0)
Hyannis (7-0)
Shelton (7-0)
Walthill (7-0)
Last edited:
Have they been class D historically?
16 games against class D schools, 3 games against class C schools.
Thanks, just something I noticed. Be interesting to see how they do in the post season.
You know....you are right, I should not do that. I'm going to take them down
Would sure hate for someone’s feelings to get hurt. Such a soft point of view.
I've been a coach for over 40 years and I've been on both sides of the spectrum. It has absolutely nothing to do with "hurt feelings". Just no reason to "kick a dog when it's down".
Last edited:
So, we now pretend really awful teams aren't awful? Or maybe that they just don't exist. Next step is not to mention losing records? Or even teams with any losses? 😊 I can't wait to see a late season news story: "In a shcoker, Tech, who had a secret record, beat previously unbeaten Eastview...". I take no pleasure in kicking a dog when it's down either, (unless of course the dog has bitten me and richly deserves it) but pretending those teams don't exist, to me, is a greater insult, and a disservice to their efforts and the sports in general. Not terribly realistic to ignore those teams collective status and then celebrate their first win, to my way of thinking. I'm guessing this attitude is one of the reasons that losing programs have participation issues.
HIGHPLAINS COACH: You are totally missing the point. No one is ignoring the fact that a team this year, this sport or any other year or sport that is/was winless isn't very talented. (I think they know that) The point was there is no need to set here or anywhere else and make light of the fact that they are not very talented.
Every athlete will hopefully grow in some manner from every athletic encounter, win or lose.
Celebrate and make light of each of their victories, no matter what they might be.