Yes I agree there are way to many honorable mention players. A 7-3 team that won a first round playoff game by a blowout and eventually lost in the second round in a nail biter to the #1 rated team in the state, had no All-Sate picks and only 3 honorable mention picks. While a team they beat by 50 points, who also hasn't won a game in over two years had 4 of their players make honorable mention. The rationale just doesn't fit. If the win less team supposedly has that many good players (one more than the 7-3 team), shouldn't they at least be competitive with that team and get at least one win over some lesser team? I know, there's a lot of players statewide and someone gets left out, it's gonna happen I get it and the coaches just nominate their own players for honorable mention, but come on then let's be realistic with the nominations. This just turns into another participation award!