As of now, which 11 man teams are going to opt into 8-man for the next cycle (confirmed or rumored)?
Also, will any 8-man teams switch to 11-man (co-ops included)?
Also, will any 8-man teams switch to 11-man (co-ops included)?
Not surprised by Cambridge, I can't believe they hung around as long as they did in 11 man. I hope they continue success at the 8 man level.Cambridge is going down to 8
Conestoga will NOT be going to 8 man, they are firmly entrenched in C1I have just heard that
Harvard, Franklin, Hampton and Redcloud are all going 6-man
and Thayer Central, Superior, wheeping water, conastoga and Tri-county are going 8-man
Repeat Just Heard not confirmed
Have they ever thought about just combining with Aurora? Or Heartland? Or is Hampton pretty set on going it alone?Hampton is a confirmed going to 6-man.
Not sure of what the reasons are for going 6-man. Seems more feasible to go 6-man now since the travel distance is less with more eastern located schools going that direction as well. I saw they were making the switch in York paper.Have they ever thought about just combining with Aurora? Or Heartland? Or is Hampton pretty set on going it alone?
Interesting. I wonder when if they will ever co-op/consolidate with Osceola? I know they've talked about it (along with Rising City and Shelby.)Heard Cross County will be going up to 11 man.
Pulling State funds wont really do anything, most of these schools receive less than 5% of funding from State money. They will have to do what Iowa does and offer more funding for Coops and whole grade sharing programs to encourage consolidations. I also do not believe the NSAA will ever gat 6-man backAnyone think if a number of teams join the 6 man rank nsaa will step in and take over again or place sanctions on other school sports? Seems like numbers are a wide spread problem across the state. Or state possibly force coops/consolidations by pulling state funds?
Osceola is talking with high plains.Interesting. I wonder when if they will ever co-op/consolidate with Osceola? I know they've talked about it (along with Rising City and Shelby.)
Interesting? Do you know anymore? It just preliminary talks? Where are the High Plains Schools? I know the towns are Polk/Hordville/Clarks.Osceola is talking with high plains.
I always felt Osceola and Shelby could have gone together and formed a pretty solid school, rather than Shelby going with Rising City.Heard a rumor that Shelby/Rising City was going 8 man but then again it might just be a rumor especially after they just put in that new field
whats up in wakefield that you would mid C2 but play 8-man ?Wakefield voted last night to remain in 8-man, even though they will likely remain ineligible for the postseason.
http://mywaynenews.com/articles/2015/11/10/top_stories/doc5641796121098531409035.txt
Conestoga should DEFINITELY go 8 man..... 16-90 in last 13 yearsConestoga will NOT be going to 8 man, they are firmly entrenched in C1
Conestoga should DEFINITELY go 8 man..... 16-90 in last 13 years
2015 2-7
2014 1-8
2013 0-8
2012 0-8
2011 6-2
2010 1-7
2009 5-3
2008 0-8
2007 0-8
2006 0-8
2005 0-8
2004 1-7
2003 0-8
What is up with Wakefield? A high migrant/ESL student population that does not or simply cannot participate in athletics because of the language barrier. When there are easily 10-20 of those students roaming the hallways your enrollment goes from 75-80 to 95-100. Wakefield is a D1 school trapped in a C2 schools body, plain and simple. They are doing what is in the best interest of their school, which is the safety of their younger players and making sure they can get through an entire season not worrying if they can make it week to week. Younger players should be allowed to properly develop on the j.v. field....not by being thrown to the wolves on a Friday night.whats up in wakefield that you would mid C2 but play 8-man ?
High ESL and low income students is not a reason some teams lose, that is not a reason and has no affect on winning or participation numbers, because if it was then it would also show an advantage that private schools have by not having as many of these types of students. I have heard on this page many times from private school supporters that it doesn't have anything to do with winning.What is up with Wakefield? A high migrant/ESL student population that does not or simply cannot participate in athletics because of the language barrier. When there are easily 10-20 of those students roaming the hallways your enrollment goes from 75-80 to 95-100. Wakefield is a D1 school trapped in a C2 schools body, plain and simple. They are doing what is in the best interest of their school, which is the safety of their younger players and making sure they can get through an entire season not worrying if they can make it week to week. Younger players should be allowed to properly develop on the j.v. field....not by being thrown to the wolves on a Friday night.
Nut, do I sense a bit ofHigh ESL and low income students is not a reason some teams lose, that is not a reason and has no affect on winning or participation numbers, because if it was then it would also show an advantage that private schools have by not having as many of these types of students. I have heard on this page many times from private school supporters that it doesn't have anything to do with winning.