ADVERTISEMENT

Football Score updates

billybob131

Freshman
Sep 30, 2017
150
72
28
anyone have any score updates
C2
#12 Cedar Catholic 44 - #5 Mitchell 14 Final

D2
#8 Dundy County Stratton 48 - #9 Johnson-Brock 8 Final

D6
#5 Parkview Christian 61 - #12 Southwest 16 Final
 
D2 Scores - All Final except one?

1 Howells Dodge 40
16 South Loup 12

8 Dundy County Stratton 48
9 Johnson Brock 8

5 Sandhills Thedford 16
12 Central valley 20

4 BDS 46 (4th Qtr)

12 Lawrence Nelson 12

3 Wynot 34
14 Twin Loup 28

6 Bloomfield 44
11 Osceola 42

7 Ainsworth 18
10 Elm Creek 33

2 Hitchcock County 52

15 Humphrey St. Francis 0
 
Last edited:
D2 Next Round Matchups?


Top of Bracket:

8 Dundy County Stratton @ 1 Howells Dodge (304 mile/5hr 11m)
4 Bruning Davenport Shickley @ 12 Central Valley (115 miles/1hr 52m)


Bottom of Bracket:

6 Bloomfield @ 3 Wynot (33 miles/34m)
2 Hitchcock @ 10 Elm Creek (114 miles/2hr)


D2 Playoff Rules:
For quarterfinal and semifinal games, the following procedure will be used:
• If the two teams both hosted their previous game, the team with the highest
point average will host. If their point averages are the same, the team with the
higher seed will host.
• If the two teams were both visitors in their previous game, the team with the
highest point average will host. If their point averages are the same, the team
with the higher seed will host.
• If one team was a visitor and one team was a host in their previous game, the
team which was a visitor will host.
 
Last edited:
CLASS A
(1) Omaha Westside 59, (16) Papillion-LaVista 21
(8) Lincoln Southwest 31, (9) Millard West 17
(12) Millard South 35, (5) Kearney 21
(4) Grand Island 35, (13) Omaha North 28

(3) Elkhorn South 48, (14) Lincoln East 20
(11) Creighton Prep 27, (6) North Platte 0
(7) Bellevue West 42, (10) Papillion-LaVista South 20
(2) Gretna 27, (15) Lincoln Southeast 24

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[8] Lincoln Southwest (8-2) at [1] Omaha Westside (9-1)
[12] Millard South (6-4) at [4] Grand Island (8-2)

[11] Creighton Prep (7-3) at [3] Elkhorn South (10-0)
[7] Bellevue West (7-3) at [2] Gretna (10-0)


CLASS B
(1) Bennington 50, (16) Beatrice 7
(9) Elkhorn North 35, (8) Lincoln Pius X 14
(5) Waverly 42, (12) Norris 13
(13) Grand Island Northwest 24, (4) Elkhorn High 21

(3) Scottsbluff 54, (14) Plattsmouth 14
(6) Omaha Skutt 21, (11) Blair 7
(7) York 21, (10) Seward 7
(2) Omaha Gross 42, (15) Elkhorn Mount Michael 0

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[9] Elkhorn North (7-3) at [1] Bennington (10-0)
[13] Grand Island Northwest (5-5) at [5] Waverly (8-2)

[6] Omaha Skutt (7-3) at [3] Scottsbluff (9-1)
[7] York (7-3) at [2] Omaha Gross (10-0)


CLASS C-1
(1) Aurora 43, (16) Columbus Scotus 13
(9) Lincoln Christian 43, (8) Omaha Roncalli 42
(5) Boone Central 48, (12) Minden 0
(4) Ashland-Greenwood 35, (13) Auburn 3

(3) McCook 42, (14) Broken Bow 14
(6) Adams Central 29, (11) Platteview 14
(7) Columbus Lakeview 28, (10) Wahoo 17
(2) Pierce 49, (15) Central City 8

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[9] Lincoln Christian (8-2) at [1] Aurora (10-0)
[5] Boone Central (8-2) at [4] Ashland-Greenwood (9-1)

[6] Adams Central (8-2) at [3] McCook (10-0)
[7] Columbus Lakeview (8-2) at [2] Pierce (10-0)


CLASS C-2
(1) Hastings St. Cecilia 29, (16) Valentine 16
(9) Battle Creek 42, (8) Gordon-Rushville 14
(12) Hartington Cedar Catholic 44, (5) Mitchell 14
(4) Malcolm 64, (13) Fremont Bergan 17

(3) Norfolk Catholic 28, (14) Yutan 14
(11) Lincoln Lutheran 31, (6) Wahoo Neumann 21
(7) Oakland-Craig 56, (10) Fillmore Central 30
(2) Ord 40, (15) Chase County 0

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[1] Hastings St. Cecilia (10-0) at [9] Battle Creek (8-2)
[4] Malcolm (10-0) at [12] Hartington Cedar Catholic (7-3)

[3] Norfolk Catholic (10-0) at [11] Lincoln Lutheran (7-3)
[7] Oakland-Craig (8-2) at [2] Ord (9-1)


CLASS D-1
(1) North Platte St. Patrick's 50, (16) Sandy Creek 14
(8) Elmwood-Murdock 50, (9) Hi-Line 30
(5) Neligh-Oakdale 34, (12) Heartland 22
(4) Riverside 30, (13) Summerland 18

(3) Stanton 54, (14) Ravenna 18
(11) Nebraska Christian 14, (6) Thayer Central 8
(7) Clarkson/Leigh 22, (10) Crofton 14
(15) Weeping Water 40, (2) Laurel-Concord-Coleridge 22

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[8] Elmwood-Murdock (9-1) at [1] North Platte St. Patrick's (10-0)
[5] Neligh-Oakdale (9-1) at [4] Riverside (9-1)

[3] Stanton (10-0) at [11] Nebraska Christian (8-2)
[7] Clarkson/Leigh (9-1) at [15] Weeping Water (6-4)


CLASS D-2
(1) Howells-Dodge 40, (16) South Loup 12
(8) Dundy County Stratton 48, (9) Johnson-Brock 8
(12) Central Valley 20, (5) Sandhills/Thedford 16
(4) BDS 54, (13) Lawrence-Nelson 26

(3) Wynot 34, (14) Twin Loup 28
(6) Bloomfield 44, (11) Osceola 42
(10) Elm Creek 33, (7) Ainsworth 18
(2) Hitchcock County 52, (15) Humphrey St. Francis 0

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[8] Dundy County Stratton (9-1) at [1] Howells-Dodge (10-0)
[4] BDS (10-0) at [12] Central Valley (9-1)

[6] Bloomfield (9-1) at [3] Wynot (9-1)
[2] Hitchcock County (10-0) at [10] Elm Creek (9-1)


CLASS D-6
(1) Sumner-Eddyville-Miller 77, (16) Wallace 31
(8) Shelton 65, (9) Sterling 20
(5) Parkview Christian 61, (12) Southwest 27
(4) Red Cloud 60, (13) Hampton 14

(3) Potter-Dix 109, (14) Brady 41
(6) Pawnee City 64, (11) Stuart 8
(10) Hay Springs 28, (7) Cody-Kilgore 12
(2) Arthur County 77, (15) Wilcox-Hildreth 12

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[8] Shelton (7-2) at [1] Sumner-Eddyville-Miller (9-0)
[5] Parkview Christian (8-1) at [4] Red Cloud (8-1)

[6] Pawnee City (7-2) at [3] Potter-Dix (9-0)
[2] Arthur County (9-0) at [10] Hay Springs (6-3)
 
Last edited:
CLASS A
(1) Omaha Westside 59, (16) Papillion-LaVista 21
(8) Lincoln Southwest 31, (9) Millard West 17
(12) Millard South 35, (5) Kearney 21
(4) Grand Island 35, (13) Omaha North 28

(3) Elkhorn South 48, (14) Lincoln East 20
(11) Creighton Prep 27, (6) North Platte 0
(7) Bellevue West 42, (10) Papillion-LaVista South 20
(2) Gretna 27, (15) Lincoln Southeast 24

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[8] Lincoln Southwest (8-2) at [1] Omaha Westside (9-1)
[12] Millard South (6-4) at [4] Grand Island (8-2)

[11] Creighton Prep (7-3) at [3] Elkhorn South (10-0)
[7] Bellevue West (7-3) at [2] Gretna (10-0)


CLASS B
(1) Bennington 50, (16) Beatrice 7
(9) Elkhorn North 35, (8) Lincoln Pius X 14
(5) Waverly 42, (12) Norris 13
(13) Grand Island Northwest 24, (4) Elkhorn High 21

(3) Scottsbluff 54, (14) Plattsmouth 14
(6) Omaha Skutt 21, (11) Blair 7
(7) York 21, (10) Seward 14
(2) Omaha Gross 42, (15) Elkhorn Mount Michael 0

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[1] Bennington (10-0) at [9] Elkhorn North (7-3)
[5] Waverly (8-2) at [13] Grand Island Northwest (5-5)

[6] Omaha Skutt (7-3) at [3] Scottsbluff (9-1)
[7] York (7-3) at [2] Omaha Gross (10-0)


CLASS C-1
(1) Aurora 43, (16) Columbus Scotus 13
(9) Lincoln Christian 43, (8) Omaha Roncalli 42
(5) Boone Central 48, (12) Minden 0
(4) Ashland-Greenwood 35, (13) Auburn 3

(3) McCook 42, (14) Broken Bow 14
(6) Adams Central 29, (11) Platteview 14
(7) Columbus Lakeview 28, (10) Wahoo 17
(2) Pierce 49, (15) Central City 8

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[1] Aurora (10-0) at [9] Lincoln Christian (8-2)
[5] Boone Central (8-2) at [4] Ashland-Greenwood (9-1)

[6] Adams Central (8-2) at [3] McCook (10-0)
[7] Columbus Lakeview (8-2) at [2] Pierce (10-0)


CLASS C-2
(1) Hastings St. Cecilia 29, (16) Valentine 16
(9) Battle Creek 42, (8) Gordon-Rushville 14
(12) Hartington Cedar Catholic 44, (5) Mitchell 14
(4) Malcolm 64, (13) Fremont Bergan 17

(3) Norfolk Catholic 28, (14) Yutan 14
(11) Lincoln Lutheran 31, (6) Wahoo Neumann 21
(7) Oakland-Craig 56, (10) Fillmore Central 30
(2) Ord 40, (15) Chase County 0

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[1] Hastings St. Cecilia (10-0) at [9] Battle Creek (8-2)
[4] Malcolm (10-0) at [12] Hartington Cedar Catholic (7-3)

[3] Norfolk Catholic (10-0) at [11] Lincoln Lutheran (7-3)
[7] Oakland-Craig (8-2) at [2] Ord (9-1)


CLASS D-1
(1) North Platte St. Patrick's 50, (16) Sandy Creek 14
(8) Elmwood-Murdock 50, (9) Hi-Line 30
(5) Neligh-Oakdale 34, (12) Heartland 22
(4) Riverside 30, (13) Summerland 18

(3) Stanton 54, (14) Ravenna 18
(11) Nebraska Christian 14, (6) Thayer Central 8
(7) Clarkson/Leigh 22, (10) Crofton 14
(15) Weeping Water 40, (2) Laurel-Concord-Coleridge 22

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[8] Elmwood-Murdock (9-1) at [1] North Platte St. Patrick's (10-0)
[5] Neligh-Oakdale (9-1) at [4] Riverside (9-1)

[3] Stanton (10-0) at [11] Nebraska Christian (8-2)
[7] Clarkson/Leigh (9-1) at [15] Weeping Water (6-4)


CLASS D-2
(1) Howells-Dodge 40, (16) South Loup 12
(8) Dundy County Stratton 12, (9) Johnson-Brock 8
(12) Central Valley 20, (5) Sandhills/Thedford 16
(4) BDS 54, (13) Lawrence-Nelson 26

(3) Wynot 34, (14) Twin Loup 28
(6) Bloomfield 44, (11) Osceola 42
(10) Elm Creek 33, (7) Ainsworth 18
(2) Hitchcock County 52, (15) Humphrey St. Francis 0

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[8] Dundy County Stratton (9-1) at [1] Howells-Dodge (10-0)
[4] BDS (10-0) at [12] Central Valley (9-1)

[6] Bloomfield (9-1) at [3] Wynot (9-1)
[2] Hitchcock County (10-0) at [10] Elm Creek (9-1)


CLASS D-6
(1) Sumner-Eddyville-Miller 77, (16) Wallace 31
(8) Shelton 65, (9) Sterling 20
(5) Parkview Christian 61, (12) Southwest 27
(4) Red Cloud 60, (13) Hampton 14

(3) Potter-Dix 109, (14) Brady 41
(6) Pawnee City 64, (11) Stuart 8
(10) Hay Springs 28, (7) Cody-Kilgore 12
(2) Arthur County 77, (15) Wilcox-Hildreth 12

Quarterfinals, next Friday
[8] Shelton (7-2) at [1] Sumner-Eddyville-Miller (9-0)
[5] Parkview Christian (8-1) at [4] Red Cloud (8-1)

[6] Pawnee City (7-2) at [3] Potter-Dix (9-0)
[2] Arthur County (9-0) at [10] Hay Springs (6-3)

High seed hosts in A, B and C1 throughout the playoffs
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinsRRUs
Does anyone know about Weeping Water and why they are upsetting good teams in the playoffs?
They played a tough regular season schedule. Weeping Water entered the playoffs with 4 losses, all to Division 1 teams.

Week 1, at Palmyra (7-1), 34-51 -- Palmyra ineliglble for playoffs
Week 2, Johnson-Brock (7-1), 22-56
Week 3, Stanton (8-0), 14-37
Week 7, at Elmwood-Murdock (7-1), 40-52
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinsRRUs
I like 16 teams too. Do I care that D1/2 have 32? No, because those classes are a crapshoot and even with one more game as a data point I think we might even know less about which teams need to be in the playoffs. Should we move A and B to 8 teams? Maybe, but what if we put more teams in A and B in general? Could be fun. Could be more competitive.
 
That's why having the substate round of 32 is fine. Playoffs start at 16 teams in 8 man to me.
Excellent point! leave it at 32 "sub state" round and re-seed, kids can say they made the playoffs even though they did not "really". The format is fine, they just need to make sure the higher seeds play at home for the playoffs throughout, they have earned that.
 
Excellent point! leave it at 32 "sub state" round and re-seed, kids can say they made the playoffs even though they did not "really". The format is fine, they just need to make sure the higher seeds play at home for the playoffs throughout, they have earned that.
The NSAA just needs to adopt the term substate for the round of 32. The playoffs start with the reseed.

All classes the high seed should host. It's complete and utter stupidity that the high seed has to go on the road.
 
Excellent point! leave it at 32 "sub state" round and re-seed, kids can say they made the playoffs even though they did not "really". The format is fine, they just need to make sure the higher seeds play at home for the playoffs throughout, they have earned that.
With Weeping Water playing 4 tough teams in the regular season and now upsetting a couple of teams in the playoffs, it seems they have earned the right to a home game...

With the NSAA controlling the schedule, these teams can't control who they play so you end up with one team playing 4 good teams while other teams play one good team all season.

Why reward a team for playing a crap schedule?
 
With Weeping Water playing 4 tough teams in the regular season and now upsetting a couple of teams in the playoffs, it seems they have earned the right to a home game...

With the NSAA controlling the schedule, these teams can't control who they play so you end up with one team playing 4 good teams while other teams play one good team all season.

Why reward a team for playing a crap schedule?
They don't deserve a home playoff game as the lower seed, they are playing well and continue, but the regular season means nothing if the higher seed doesn't host. Just like March Madness , many lower seeds make a run because they are paying well, not because of strength of schedule necessarily. Clarkson Leigh has played 4 playoff teams, 5 if you count this Friday and have to go on the road and Stanton has played 7 games against playoff teams, 8 if you include this Friday and have beaten two of the other teams in the quarters and have to go on the road as the #3 seed. There are also other examples, the NSAA has to fix this for next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: northeastNebraska
With Weeping Water playing 4 tough teams in the regular season and now upsetting a couple of teams in the playoffs, it seems they have earned the right to a home game...

Why reward a team for playing a crap schedule?
Clarkson-Leigh shouldn't have to go on the road. They are the higher seed, they earned it by winning 7 regular season games. Weeping Water won four, all four against teams that finished below .500. They are hot right now, I get it, but the high seed should host at the end of the day. Period. I will say the same thing next week even if CL loses.
 
They don't deserve a home playoff game as the lower seed, they are playing well and continue, but the regular season means nothing if the higher seed doesn't host. Just like March Madness , many lower seeds make a run because they are paying well, not because of strength of schedule necessarily. Clarkson Leigh has played 4 playoff teams, 5 if you count this Friday and have to go on the road and Stanton has played 7 games against playoff teams, 8 if you include this Friday and have beaten two of the other teams in the quarters and have to go on the road as the #3 seed. There are also other examples, the NSAA has to fix this for next year.
Clarkson-Leigh shouldn't have to go on the road. They are the higher seed, they earned it by winning 7 regular season games. Weeping Water won four, all four against teams that finished below .500. They are hot right now, I get it, but the high seed should host at the end of the day. Period. I will say the same thing next week even if CL loses.

Here are the 2 schedules for Weeping Water and CL.

poqcP390j

qcP390.jpg

pn65ZSWjj

65ZSWj.jpg


In the regular season only (as that's how teams are getting their ratings/points/seedings), Clarkson Leigh played teams that finished: 8-0, 5-3, 5-3, and a 4-4 team... Then teams with losing records.

WW played teams that finished: 8-0, 7-1, 7-1, 7-1, and a 4-4 team... Then teams with losing records.

If WW played CL's schedule, they might go undefeated or 7-1, just like CL. Who knows?

If CL played WW's schedule, they might go 4-4. Who knows?

Schedules aren't fair, so rewarding teams for getting lucky with their schedule isn't fair... So by upsetting a team in the playoffs, you are somewhat proving that the seedings were incorrect and that you deserved a higher seed to begin with.

Yes, WW is hot now, but with so many teams in D1 and D2, how do you make a fair and balanced schedule for all teams? You can't. Therefore it's impossible to get the playoff seedings correct and why 32 teams is better than 16 teams.

# of teams (% of teams played in regular season)

Class A - 31 teams (30%)
Class B - 26 teams (36%)
Class C1 - 38 teams (34%)
Class C2 - 36 teams (26%)
Class D1 - 61 teams (13%)
Class D2 - 54 teams (15%)
Class D6 - 34 teams (24%)

The upper class teams have to be seeded better because they play 26% - 36% of the team's in their class (yes, many teams play a team out of their class). That's a much better sample size.

Class D teams play only 13% and 15% of the total teams in their class, so the ratings can't be seeded correctly based on schedule because the sample size is too small.

The percentages only move up to 15% and 17% after the first "playoff" game. Small sample size.

How can you truly earn a home field playoff advantage when you at such a small percentage of the team's in your class?

Again, why reward teams for playing crap schedules?
 
Clarkson-Leigh shouldn't have to go on the road. They are the higher seed, they earned it by winning 7 regular season games. Weeping Water won four, all four against teams that finished below .500. They are hot right now, I get it, but the high seed should host at the end of the day. Period. I will say the same thing next week even if CL loses.
They absolutely SHOULD be on the road. The two teams haven't played. They have one common opponent. WW won. CL lost. WW in ANY but an alternative universe would be the HIGHER seed, Ask any wrestling coach. Therin lies the biggest danger of using flawed "seeds" to determine a teams fate. If those two reversed schedules the evidence indicates that WW would be 8-0 and CL no better than 4-4. WW on paper is the better team. Period. Your rewarding CL for playing a cushy schedule and punishing WW for playing a gauntlet.
 
They absolutely SHOULD be on the road. The two teams haven't played. They have one common opponent. WW won. CL lost. WW in ANY but an alternative universe would be the HIGHER seed, Ask any wrestling coach. Therin lies the biggest danger of using flawed "seeds" to determine a teams fate. If those two reversed schedules the evidence indicates that WW would be 8-0 and CL no better than 4-4. WW on paper is the better team. Period. Your rewarding CL for playing a cushy schedule and punishing WW for playing a gauntlet.
I though you were against bus rides and travel? maybe the computer should determine the winner virtually?? that would save all the players and coaches the anguish of sitting in a bus and going to play football to try to win a state title. There is a system in place and seeding, the better seed should host, period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bballcoach15
I though you were against bus rides and travel? maybe the computer should determine the winner virtually?? that would save all the players and coaches the anguish of sitting in a bus and going to play football to try to win a state title. There is a system in place and seeding, the better seed should host, period.
Unneeded burdens, absolutely. You're right. There IS a system in place. And Weeping Water IS hosting. You seem to contradict yourself. My only point (I think I should explain it to you)in that post is that Weeping Water DESERVES a higher seed by any rational measure. WW handled, quite easily, a team CL couldn't beat and you want to punish THAT???
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinsRRUs
Here are the 2 schedules for Weeping Water and CL.

poqcP390j

qcP390.jpg

pn65ZSWjj

65ZSWj.jpg


In the regular season only (as that's how teams are getting their ratings/points/seedings), Clarkson Leigh played teams that finished: 8-0, 5-3, 5-3, and a 4-4 team... Then teams with losing records.

WW played teams that finished: 8-0, 7-1, 7-1, 7-1, and a 4-4 team... Then teams with losing records.

If WW played CL's schedule, they might go undefeated or 7-1, just like CL. Who knows?

If CL played WW's schedule, they might go 4-4. Who knows?

Schedules aren't fair, so rewarding teams for getting lucky with their schedule isn't fair... So by upsetting a team in the playoffs, you are somewhat proving that the seedings were incorrect and that you deserved a higher seed to begin with.

Yes, WW is hot now, but with so many teams in D1 and D2, how do you make a fair and balanced schedule for all teams? You can't. Therefore it's impossible to get the playoff seedings correct and why 32 teams is better than 16 teams.

# of teams (% of teams played in regular season)

Class A - 31 teams (30%)
Class B - 26 teams (36%)
Class C1 - 38 teams (34%)
Class C2 - 36 teams (26%)
Class D1 - 61 teams (13%)
Class D2 - 54 teams (15%)
Class D6 - 34 teams (24%)

The upper class teams have to be seeded better because they play 26% - 36% of the team's in their class (yes, many teams play a team out of their class). That's a much better sample size.

Class D teams play only 13% and 15% of the total teams in their class, so the ratings can't be seeded correctly based on schedule because the sample size is too small.

The percentages only move up to 15% and 17% after the first "playoff" game. Small sample size.

How can you truly earn a home field playoff advantage when you at such a small percentage of the team's in your class?

Again, why reward teams for playing crap schedules?
Rewarding for crap schedule only gives a home field advantage, then a quick exit. If you win all the games on your schedule, there is only so much you can do. In my poll I posted the other day most feel that there is no advantage to playing at your home field. But also, the length of the bus ride did come into account. Hitchcock County will travel to Elm Creek Friday to avenge a first-round loss at Elm Creek two years ago. In my opinion, Hitchcock will not even slow down whether this game was at home or at Elm Creek. Their mission is to play for a state title against the best team in the class. Let's fast forward to Friday already! Weeping Water will show up for their home game and continue their run in the playoffs, 50 - 22.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinsRRUs
Unneeded burdens, absolutely. You're right. There IS a system in place. And Weeping Water IS hosting. You seem to contradict yourself. My only point (I think I should explain it to you)in that post is that Weeping Water DESERVES a higher seed by any rational measure. WW handled, quite easily, a team CL couldn't beat and you want to punish THAT???
They don't deserve a higher seed based on who they have played, They were not playing as well at the beginning of the year and they got blasted by a D2 team that is already out of the playoffs and lost to quality D1 teams, but the games were not very competitive. With that being said, they are playing well now and they will continue their playoff run. If they lost close, one score games to quality opponents you may have an argument for a higher seed, they might get to avenge a loss in the next round and they can show their improvement. The regular season matters, maybe that prepared them for this run, but the points are gained for a reason and only A, B and C1 have it figured out, higher seed plays at home.
 
Clarkson-Leigh shouldn't have to go on the road. They are the higher seed, they earned it by winning 7 regular season games.
Clarkson-Leigh lost to the only team they played that had 6 wins or more (until beating a 6-win Crofton team a few days ago).

In the playoffs, they played a 5-3 Wisner-Pilger team and pounded them 28-23...

Then they played a 6-3 Crofton team who got their 6th win in the first round and pounded them by a score of 22-14...

I wouldn't be shocked one bit if WW beats CL because WW was incorrectly seeded based on their unfair schedule and CL was gifted an easy schedule... But both teams are good and it should be a good game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighPlainsCoach
Clarkson-Leigh lost to the only team they played that had 6 wins or more (until beating a 6-win Crofton team a few days ago).

In the playoffs, they played a 5-3 Wisner-Pilger team and pounded them 28-23...

Then they played a 6-3 Crofton team who got their 6th win in the first round and pounded them by a score of 22-14...

I wouldn't be shocked one bit if WW beats CL because WW was incorrectly seeded based on their unfair schedule and CL was gifted an easy schedule... But both teams are good and it should be a good game.
I wouldn't be surprised if WW wins either, but that doesn't mean they deserve a home game. Using the current point system, there is no reason the high seed should have to travel. In what world does that make sense?
 
Using the current point system, there is no reason the high seed should have to travel. In what world does that make sense?
In a world where teams only play 13% and 15% of the teams in their class, which doesn't allow for the playoff system to properly seed almost every team.

If the season were only 4 games long, then we seeded for the playoffs and only 32 or 16 teams made it out of the 61 and 54 teams in each class, would that be fair? Would you still agree that the higher seed has EARNED the right to all home games in the playoffs?

Now if Class D played a schedule like Class A, where they played 30% of the team's in their class, I would agree with you.

I highly doubt Class D teams will play 16 or 18 regular season games though... Wouldn't you agree? Because if you want to compare apples to apples, that's how many regular season games it would take for Class D to be the same as Class A, which does give home field advantage to the higher seed.
 
Clarkson-Leigh lost to the only team they played that had 6 wins or more (until beating a 6-win Crofton team a few days ago).

In the playoffs, they played a 5-3 Wisner-Pilger team and pounded them 28-23...

Then they played a 6-3 Crofton team who got their 6th win in the first round and pounded them by a score of 22-14...

I wouldn't be shocked one bit if WW beats CL because WW was incorrectly seeded based on their unfair schedule and CL was gifted an easy schedule... But both teams are good and it should be a good game.
Don't say unfair schedule, You play who is on you schedule. Weeping Water got better throughout the year. They were blown out a couple of times and lost a couple other games to solid teams. They earned their seed based on their record. It is great to see them winning and playing well but you can't just forget blowout losses and not beating any of the good teams on their regular season schedule.
 
Don't say unfair schedule, You play who is on you schedule. Weeping Water got better throughout the year. They were blown out a couple of times and lost a couple other games to solid teams. They earned their seed based on their record. It is great to see them winning and playing well but you can't just forget blowout losses and not beating any of the good teams on their regular season schedule.
“You play who is on your schedule”, right….but you didn’t pick the schedule, sans maybe a mutually requested game. That’s the point. There’s too many teams and only 8 games in 8 man before the playoffs. (The percentages are above). You win on the road after the reseed in 8 man you should get a home game imo.
 
Don't say unfair schedule, You play who is on you schedule. Weeping Water got better throughout the year. They were blown out a couple of times and lost a couple other games to solid teams. They earned their seed based on their record. It is great to see them winning and playing well but you can't just forget blowout losses and not beating any of the good teams on their regular season schedule.
You can't say that, then give the team that played a whole lot of nothing- burgers the higher seed! WW would be seeded higher by any reasonable measure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinsRRUs
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT