Here are the 2 schedules for Weeping Water and CL.
In the regular season only (as that's how teams are getting their ratings/points/seedings), Clarkson Leigh played teams that finished: 8-0, 5-3, 5-3, and a 4-4 team... Then teams with losing records.
WW played teams that finished: 8-0, 7-1, 7-1, 7-1, and a 4-4 team... Then teams with losing records.
If WW played CL's schedule, they might go undefeated or 7-1, just like CL. Who knows?
If CL played WW's schedule, they might go 4-4. Who knows?
Schedules aren't fair, so rewarding teams for getting lucky with their schedule isn't fair... So by upsetting a team in the playoffs, you are somewhat proving that the seedings were incorrect and that you deserved a higher seed to begin with.
Yes, WW is hot now, but with so many teams in D1 and D2, how do you make a fair and balanced schedule for all teams? You can't. Therefore it's impossible to get the playoff seedings correct and why 32 teams is better than 16 teams.
# of teams (% of teams played in regular season)
Class A - 31 teams (30%)
Class B - 26 teams (36%)
Class C1 - 38 teams (34%)
Class C2 - 36 teams (26%)
Class D1 - 61 teams
(13%)
Class D2 - 54 teams
(15%)
Class D6 - 34 teams (24%)
The upper class teams have to be seeded better because they play 26% - 36% of the team's in their class (yes, many teams play a team out of their class). That's a much better sample size.
Class D teams play only 13% and 15% of the total teams in their class, so the ratings can't be seeded correctly based on schedule because the sample size is too small.
The percentages only move up to 15% and 17% after the first "playoff" game. Small sample size.
How can you truly earn a home field playoff advantage when you at such a small percentage of the team's in your class?
Again, why reward teams for playing crap schedules?