I’d love to see lacrosse here.There is also a movement over the last 2 years to get lacrosse sanctioned by the NSAA as well.
Boys volleyball is much more likely to pass than lacrosse, IMOI’d love to see lacrosse here.
The article says they are at the very, very beginning stages of exploring it. I don't think any surveys or anything have been done yet. The article does mention that 36 states currently sanction varsity boys volleyball, with Minnesota and Missouri the most recent states to add it. It would be a spring sport.I can't read the article because I don't have a subscription, but is there that much demand for boys volleyball in Nebraska?
Per the article in the original post, the reasoning for placing boys vb in the spring is so as not to conflict with the girls game. There are no issues with court availability and the assumption is alot of these teams would have the girls coaches also coach the boys teams.Current NSAA sport offerings by season and gender
Fall
Boys (3)- Football, Cross Country, Tennis
Girls (4)- Volleyball, Softball, Cross Country, Golf
Winter
Boys (4)- Basketball, Wrestling, Swim/Dive, Bowling
Girls (4)- Basketball, Wrestling, Swim/Dive, Bowling
Spring
Boys (4)- Baseball, Soccer, Track/Field, Golf
Girls (3)- Soccer, Track/Field, Tennis
Adding boys volleyball in the spring wouldn't make a lot of sense to me. Add it in the fall so it aligns with girls volleyball (just like basketball, soccer, wrestling, track/field). It would also put 4 sport offerings in all 3 seasons. Spring is already the most compact season on the calendar. Adding another sport into that mix is a poor idea in my opinion.
I'm not sure I understand the logic in the article, specifically with courts.Per the article in the original post, the reasoning for placing boys vb in the spring is so as not to conflict with the girls game. There are no issues with court availability and the assumption is alot of these teams would have the girls coaches also coach the boys teams.