As someone who has been a ref, coach, and spectator for multiple sports this years officiating in basketball was some of the worst I've seen. I agree as spectators and fans there is cleaning up to be done, however, when you see a reffing crew walk in for a game and you immediately know that the fouls will be lopsided or travels will not be called or they favor a specific play style (typically more aggressive as they don't call as many fouls) its VERY frustrating. I can name several crews that should not be allowed to ref games until they take some courses or extra education they were that bad. Take the crew that had the controversy in the EPPJ and Summerland game. Is what happened in that game enough to warrant that crew getting reprimanded? Maybe. Maybe not. But I can point out about 5 other games they did with multiple other games that made the game unwatchable. All I hear for the argument about reprimanding officials is there's a shortage and hard to get refs as it is. So hear me out, what happens if we go back to having two officials? Those two if they are good officials can see just as much as the three and it doesn't become so much of a I will watch the ball, you watch this area, and you watch the paint. Because then several refs I've heard this season say "that's not my call to make". So why can't we go back to two? I feel it would just force those refs to be more attentive instead of thinking the other two can pick up the slack. I saw a lot of JV refs (two man crews, usually people associated with the home teams) do a much better and much less biased job than the certified varsity refs that followed them. Crowds get less nasty when games are well officiated but there's a problem going on in both departments right now.