ADVERTISEMENT

Live feed

Forum list Trending threads

Live feed

 Posts

NSAA Legislative Proposals

H
Mr. Irrelevent said:
I get your argument. I just know it's been an issue brought up for many years. To give you an idea. Clarkson-Leigh spearheaded the proposal for the 55 number from what I was told. Sounds like their AD spoke to the 8 man coaches association about what most coaches believed the number should be. I don't know that anyone believes the add a class proposal will pass, and I bet that actually hurts the proposal for the number at 55.T

As far as Pender submitting the proposal, I'm sure it's because C-L reached out to their AD...being in the same conference. Most of the time when ADs put a proposal in, they want it in several districts so that it doesn't come as a surprise to people in other districts if it advances to the 2nd meeting.
Click to expand...
This is probably true, I have no idea what everyone's reasoning is, I just know the "player safety" and "be competitive" arguments are vastly overblown. Let's all just be honest and call it what it is.

And what if we do go to 55? How long until teams want to go to 60? Why not 70?
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: EndzoneView

NSAA Legislative Proposals

Mr. Irrelevent
huskerfan1414 said:
“Keep kids safe”. They can keep kids safe. They can opt down and be ineligible for the playoffs. If they are that low and want to be “competitive” they have that option. But this isnt about that. Its about wanting to win and make a run in the playoffs. Who gets to define “competitive”?
This is at the detriment of schools with legitimate 8 man enrollment numbers who dont have the boys in school to play 11 man. It isnt their fault if no one wants to go out in some other district. What about their kids being safe?
Nebraska isnt like other states. We are our own state with unique school enrollment populations. I think the 8 man number is perfect.

To your question, according to the information above, Pender. They are in exemption this cycle. I exaggerated with 50 so not sure exactly, but it is definitely above 40. Great program, good people and they can initiate what they want so I mean no disrespect, just disagreement. Disagreement is part of these discussions. To be fair, I have no idea what their enrollment will be next cycle, so maybe they would be above even the 55 they proposed, and they'll play 11 man anyway? Or maybe they are dropping back down below 48? But if they want it changed so they can continue playing 8 man and be eligible for playoffs with higher enrollment, dont tell me its for player safety with those numbers.
I see Plainview also sponsored a proposal and they are in exemption this cycle. No idea what their enrollment will be next cycle either so maybe it has nothing to do with that, but they are not hurting for players either.
I do think there is a smart proposal there regarding the ineligible teams. If your enrollment number in your 2nd year of being ineligible for the playoffs is below the cutoff number, you can be eligible. That makes sense.
I know about Howells dodge, big fan and they are the best football program in the state.
Click to expand...
I get your argument. I just know it's been an issue brought up for many years. To give you an idea. Clarkson-Leigh spearheaded the proposal for the 55 number from what I was told. Sounds like their AD spoke to the 8 man coaches association about what most coaches believed the number should be. I don't know that anyone believes the add a class proposal will pass, and I bet that actually hurts the proposal for the number at 55.

As far as Pender submitting the proposal, I'm sure it's because C-L reached out to their AD...being in the same conference. Most of the time when ADs put a proposal in, they want it in several districts so that it doesn't come as a surprise to people in other districts if it advances to the 2nd meeting.
Click to expand...

NSAA Legislative Proposals

H
Mr. Irrelevent said:
I don’t believe it’s at all about winning a championship. The first school to put this proposal in was a D2 school and through discussions others also put it in. I believe it’s about schools feeling they can safely compete. Different people have different philosophies on what number it takes out to keep kids safe.

Howells-Dodge had no problem going up to 11 man a while back. Good teams are good regardless of how many guys are on the field.

Have been told many times HAC will play 11 man so long as they have 30 guys out. I find that very honorable.

Neumann has close to 75 out I believe. Turned on their game a couple times and their sideline is packed. Seems they don’t have many 2 way players either.

We are the lowest number of any state with 8 man football. Agree with northeast, we don’t need another class. They’ve tried that and it fails misserably.

What school doesn’t want to go up to 11 man but has 50 out so they want the number changed? Curious… Also, have they already used their exemption?
Click to expand...
“Keep kids safe”. They can keep kids safe. They can opt down and be ineligible for the playoffs. If they are that low and want to be “competitive” they have that option. But this isnt about that. Its about wanting to win and make a run in the playoffs. Who gets to define “competitive”?
This is at the detriment of schools with legitimate 8 man enrollment numbers who dont have the boys in school to play 11 man. It isnt their fault if no one wants to go out in some other district. What about their kids being safe?
Nebraska isnt like other states. We are our own state with unique school enrollment populations. I think the 8 man number is perfect.

To your question, according to the information above, Pender. They are in exemption this cycle. I exaggerated with 50 so not sure exactly, but it is definitely above 40. Great program, good people and they can initiate what they want so I mean no disrespect, just disagreement. Disagreement is part of these discussions. To be fair, I have no idea what their enrollment will be next cycle, so maybe they would be above even the 55 they proposed, and they'll play 11 man anyway? Or maybe they are dropping back down below 48? But if they want it changed so they can continue playing 8 man and be eligible for playoffs with higher enrollment, dont tell me its for player safety with those numbers.
I see Plainview also sponsored a proposal and they are in exemption this cycle. No idea what their enrollment will be next cycle either so maybe it has nothing to do with that, but they are not hurting for players either.
I do think there is a smart proposal there regarding the ineligible teams. If your enrollment number in your 2nd year of being ineligible for the playoffs is below the cutoff number, you can be eligible. That makes sense.
I know about Howells dodge, big fan and they are the best football program in the state.
Click to expand...

Volleyball C1/C2 Volleyball Region Subs

Mr. Irrelevent
GrizzzlyPanda said:
yes....I am saying in C1 region 2, there will be 3 sub winners, and likely 3 wildcards coming out of the losers in that region.
Click to expand...
Similar to a sub having a winner and 2 wildcards in the old system. Happened many times in the Lincoln area and northeast Nebraska. It will be interesting to see how it plays out and if people like it or hate it.
Click to expand...

Softball District Scores from Wednesday (10/9)

A
Scores from opening play of the double-elimination Class A district tournaments

CLASS A

A-1 at Gretna
Omaha Benson 10, Omaha Burke 6
Gretna 12, Omaha Benson 0
Lincoln East 14, Bellevue West 4

Bellevue West 16, Omaha Burke 1 (Burke eliminated)
Bellevue West 19, Omaha Benson 1 (Benson eliminated)

Thursday
Gretna vs. Lincoln East
Bellevue West vs. Gretna/LE loser

===========================

A-2 at Lincoln
Lincoln High 15, Omaha Bryan 8
Lincoln Southwest 16, Lincoln High 0
Millard South 9, Omaha Westview 6

Omaha Westview 15, Omaha Bryan 0 (Bryan eliminated)
Omaha Westview 10, Lincoln High 0 (Lincoln High eliminated)

Thursday
Lincoln Southwest vs. Millard South
Omaha Westview vs. LSW/MS loser

===========================

A-3 at Millard North
North Platte 15, Omaha North 1
Millard North 14, North Platte 2
Omaha Westside 11, Omaha Central 3
Millard North 10, Omaha Westside 2

Omaha Central 12, Omaha North 0 (ON eliminated)

Thursday
North Platte vs. Omaha Central
Omaha Westside vs. NP/OC winner
Millard North vs. TBA

===========================


A-4 at Millard West
Omaha Buena Vista 10, South Sioux City 9
Millard West 16, Omaha Buena Vista 0
Lincoln North Star 13, Fremont 9
Millard West 10, Lincoln Northwest 2

Fremont 11, South Sioux City 1 (SSC eliminated)

Thursday
Omaha Buena Vista vs. Fremont
Lincoln North Star vs. OBV/Fremont winner
Millard West vs. TBA

===========================

A-5 at Papillion-LaVista
Papillion-LaVista 6, Lincoln Southeast 1
Kearney 6, Grand Island 2
Papillion-LaVista 6, Kearney 5
Grand Island 5, Lincoln Southeast 2 (LSE elimianted)

Thursday
Grand Island vs. Kearney
Papillion-LaVista vs. GI/Kearney winner

===========================

A-6 at Elkhorn South
Elkhorn South 6, Columbus 1
Papillion-LaVista South 8, Omaha South 0
Papillion-LaVista South 7, Elkhorn South 1
Columbus 12, Omaha South 6 (OS eliminated)

Thursday
Columbus vs. Elkhorn South
Papillion-LaVista South vs. COL/ES winner

===========================

A-7 at Bellevue East
Bellevue East 14, Lincoln Northeast 4
Norfolk 16, Omaha Marian 8
Bellevue East 6, Norfolk 1
Omaha Marian 13, Lincoln Northeast 12 (LNE eliminated)

Thursday
Omaha Marian vs. Norfolk
Bellevue East vs. OM/NOR winner
Click to expand...

NSAA Legislative Proposals

Mr. Irrelevent
Alum-Ni said:
Okay....I thought I had read somewhere that the 11-man schools were always voting down the changes to the 8-man game....but I could be entirely mistaken.
Click to expand...

huskerfan1414 said:
Because we have a good number. I don't understand why people think the number needs to go up, just because there are schools who wish they could make 8 man playoffs? Why are we wanting to punish the real 8 man schools?
Click to expand...
I don’t believe it’s at all about winning a championship. The first school to put this proposal in was a D2 school and through discussions others also put it in. I believe it’s about schools feeling they can safely compete. Different people have different philosophies on what number it takes out to keep kids safe.

Howells-Dodge had no problem going up to 11 man a while back. Good teams are good regardless of how many guys are on the field.

Have been told many times HAC will play 11 man so long as they have 30 guys out. I find that very honorable.

Neumann has close to 75 out I believe. Turned on their game a couple times and their sideline is packed. Seems they don’t have many 2 way players either.

We are the lowest number of any state with 8 man football. Agree with northeast, we don’t need another class. They’ve tried that and it fails misserably.

What school doesn’t want to go up to 11 man but has 50 out so they want the number changed? Curious… Also, have they already used their exemption?
Click to expand...

NSAA Legislative Proposals

H
Mr. Irrelevent said:
There are some interesting ones in there. Seems like they’ve been trying to figure out a good 8 man football number forever with no luck of getting a change through.
Click to expand...
Because we have a good number. I don't understand why people think the number needs to go up, just because there are schools who wish they could make 8 man playoffs? Why are we wanting to punish the real 8 man schools?
Click to expand...

NSAA Legislative Proposals

H
Power_I_82 said:
I think what we see is the teams at the bottom of class D (D2) are apprehensive about upping the number of eligible teams into 8 man. What you would see in the two class system we have now is 6-8 (maybe, not familiar with numbers so maybe its more or less) of the teams at the bottom of D1 get pushed into D2. As a D2 team there really is no reason to support this. Also, if a D1 is in the bottom 1/3rd of the class enrollment wise, they will get pushed to the bottom of D1 with bigger schools coming in on the top, theoretically making it harder to compete. I think to some, this proposal only helps those schools at the bottom of C2 or top of D1. I do however think there is some momentum behind the 3 class D system and evenly split them. 9 games/16 to the playoffs. This will still not get around the low numbers/participation issue schools are facing. The teams that have forfeited this year were middle of the pack enrollment wise. In the 3 class system, they are probably lower D1 or D2.
Maybe helping schools get into a more competitive class will help get more kids out? Who knows. I tend to think if a kid won't go out because he doesn't want to lose, he's gonna be the first to quit you when times get tough anyway. As a coach, its tough to trust those kids to be there when you need them. A few of these proposals have been on there the last few years. I'd guess they eventually get passed.
Click to expand...
this isn't about being "competitive". If it was about being competitive they would all be fine with the current opt-down but don't make the playoffs system. This is about trying to win a championship. One of the schools proposing this has 50 kids on their roster.
Click to expand...

Other Sports XC Results (10/8)

A
Centennial Conference
at Lincoln

Link: https://results.blacksquirreltiming.com/meets/40732

BOYS
1. Lincoln Lutheran - 23
2. Lincoln Christian - 31
3. Omaha Concordia - 49
4. Boys Town - 72
5. Kearney Catholic - 93
6. Columbus Scotus - 109
7. Wahoo Neumann - 114
8. Hastings St. Cecilia - 131
9. Grand Island Central Catholic - 142
10. Fremont Bergan - 179

1. Trevin Opp, Lincoln Christian - 16:40
2. Payton Day, Omaha Concordia - 17:31
3. Shawn Arnold, Lincoln Christian - 17:46
4. Max Prochnow, Lincoln Lutheran - 18:00
5. Grant Stowell, Lincoln Lutheran - 18:11
6. Gavin Loewe, Lincoln Lutheran - 18:12
7. Miles Sughroue, Kearney Catholic - 18:15
8. Cooper Schelkopf, Lincoln Lutheran - 18:30
9. Caleb Maudlin, Omaha Concordia - 18:43
10. Jorge Reyes, Boys Town - 18:44

========================

GIRLS
1. Columbus Scotus - 21
2. Kearney Catholic - 25
3. Omaha Concordia - 56
4. Lincoln Christian - 81
5. Wahoo Neumann - 84
6. Lincoln Lutheran - 94

1. Avery Heinrich, Columbus Scotus - 20:20
2. Jaelyn Witter, Kearney Catholic - 20:40
3. Lily Daly, Hastings St. Cecilia - 20:51
4. Emilyn Kavan, Columbus Scotus - 20:51
5. Emery Vargas, Hastings St. Cecilia - 21:16
6. Hannah Heinrich, Columbus Scotus - 21:50
7. Hadley McGowen, Kearney Catholic - 22:34
8. Clara Heppner, Lincoln Christian - 22:46
9. Joy Jipp, Omaha Concordia - 23:07
10. Ella Kucera, Kearney Catholic - 23:11
Click to expand...

Other Sports XC Results (10/8)

A
East Central Nebraska Conference
at Falls City

Link: https://results.blacksquirreltiming.com/meets/40733

BOYS
1. Palmyra - 19
2. Freeman - 32
3. Johnson County Central - 46
4. Auburn - 68
5. Elmwood-Murdock - 80
6. Falls City - 102
7. Weeping Water - 113

1. Jobjosiah Muthiani, Freeman - 16:50
2. Gannon Hubbard, Palmyra - 17:13
3. Emmanuel Muthiani, Freeman - 17:53
4. Owen Ramaekers, Palmyra - 17:57
5. Cuyler Aue, Auburn - 18:01
6. Kaden Moody, Palmyra - 18:02
7. Noah Lang, Palmyra - 18:07
8. Logan Topp, Johnson County Central - 18:19
9. Trevin Huskey, Johnson County Central - 18:21
10. Christian Brettmann, Elmwood-Murdock - 19:10

=============================

GIRLS
1. Auburn - 13
2. Palmyra - 37
3. Freeman - 47
4. Falls City - 59

1. Liston Crotty, Auburn - 20:33
2. Olivia Crotty, Auburn - 20:48
3. Erin Chambers, Palmyra - 20:58
4. Madison VanLaningham, Johnson County Central - 21:35
5. Kristen Billings, Auburn - 21:42
6. Hailey Hengtgen, Palmyra - 21:44
7. Lilyan Becker, Auburn - 21:47
8. Hadley Mazzulla, Auburn - 21:59
9. Aleah Thomas, Auburn - 22:10
10. Trinity Buss, Freeman - 22:13
Click to expand...

Other Sports XC Results (10/8)

A
Mid-Nebraska Activities Conference
at Arnold

Link: https://www.athletic.net/CrossCountry/meet/249686/info

BOYS
1. South Loup - 6

1. Jaden Bush, South Loup - 17:59
2. Connor Sutton, Sandhills/Thedford - 18:07
3. Keith Morash, Sandhills Valley - 18:30
4. Josiah Coleman, South Loup - 18:39
5. Dawson Mason, South Loup - 19:06
6. Jayden Tillman, Brady - 19:38
7. Walter Bierman, South Loup - 20:13
8. Brady Haake, Sandhills/Thedford - 20:31
9. Caleb McFate, South Loup - 21:24
10. Eli Rogers, South Loup - 21:43

========================

GIRLS
1. Mullen - 6
2. Brady - 21
3. Sandhills Valley - 24

1. Peyton Paxton, Mullen - 20:41
2. Riley Hegland, Mullen - 20:53
3. Ella Cool, South Loup - 21:02
4. Ivy Tullis, South Loup - 22:00
5. Harper Andersen, Mullen - 22:13
6. Ady Hampton, Mullen - 22:40
7. Ani Trimble, Sandhills Valley - 23:17
8. Zoe Johnson, Brady - 23:54
9. Jocelyn Franzen, Brady - 25:07
10. Violet Gentry, Brady - 25:18
Click to expand...

Other Sports XC Results (10/8)

A
LouPlatte Conference
at Wood River

Link: https://www.athletic.net/CrossCountry/meet/250757/info

BOYS
1. Doniphan-Trumbull - 13
2. Ord - 19
3. Gibbon - 31
4. Wood River - 38
5. Central City - 38
6. St. Paul - 48
7. Centura - 69
8. Ravenna - 85
9. Arcadia/Loup City - 109

1. Kaser Johnson, Doniphan-Trumbull - 16:25
2. Elijah Pollard, Ord - 17:17
3. Tice Yost, Doniphan-Trumbull - 17:33
4. Darian Dorsey, Gibbon - 18:16
5. Hector Bonilla, Wood River - 18:17
6. Garret Severance, Ord - 18:34
7. Austin Wood, Central City - 18:41
8. Eli Sladek, St. Paul - 18:45
9. Bladen Rainforth, Doniphan-Trumbull - 18:48
10. Jacob Zakrzewski, Doniphan-Trumbull - 18:53

=============================

GIRLS
1. Central City - 9
2. Doniphan-Trumbull - 16
3. St. Paul - 28
4. Gibbon - 45
5. Ravenna - 50
6. Ord - 60
7. Wood River - 61

1. Sevyn Russell, Doniphan-Trumbull - 22:11
2. Janaya Davis, Central City - 22:21
3. Amelia Buhlke, Central City - 23:13
4. Julia Buss, Central City - 24:20
5. Avery Bruha, Ord - 24:39
6. Morgan Leth, Doniphan-Trumbull - 24:42
7. Madi Shippen, St. Paul - 24:50
8. Katie Kleinsasser, St. Paul - 25:11
9. Reba Watts, Doniphan-Trumbull - 25:19
10. Cherish Faircloth, Wood River - 25:26
Click to expand...

Other Sports District Girls Golf Results

A
All district results now posted

Comprehensive list of state qualifying teams

CLASS A
Columbus
Elkhorn South
Fremont
Kearney
Lincoln East
Lincoln Southeast
Lincoln Southwest
Millard West
Norfolk
North Platte
Omaha Marian
Omaha Westside

CLASS B
Adams Central
Bennington
Elkhorn North
Grand Island Northwest
Gretna East
Lincoln Pius X
Norris
Omaha Duchesne
Omaha Skutt
Scottsbluff
Sidney
York

CLASS C
Atkinson West Holt
Boone Central
Chadron
Columbus Scotus
Exeter-Milligan/Friend
Grand Island Central Catholic
Holdrege
Laurel-Concord-Coleridge
Lincoln Christian
Minden
Ogallala
Omaha Concordia
Sutton
Valentine
Wayne
Click to expand...

Other Sports XC Rankings (10/8)

A
CLASS D

BOYS
(team rankings N/A)

1. Mason McGreer, Perkins County
2. Elijah Goodell, Perkins County
3. Kaser Johnson, Doniphan-Trumbull
4. Jacob Swanson, Nebraska Christian
5. Tice Yost, Doniphan-Trumbull
6. Austin Benda, Hemingford
7. Dimitri Pettit, North Platte St. Patrick's
8. Andrew Martin, Atkinson West Holt
9. Dawson Meyer, Oakland-Craig
10. Jobjosiah Muthiani, Freeman
11. Samuel Holsing, Tri County
12. Jayden Fuehrer, McCool Junction
13. Marcus Hernandez, Bertrand/Loomis
14. Coltan Ham, North Platte St. Patrick's
15. Gannon Pfister, Ponca

=========================

GIRLS
(team rankings N/A)

1. Delani Runnels, Niobrara/Verdigre
2. Ashley Robertson, Wallace
3. Sage Holtmeier, Tri County
4. Kayleigh Betka, McCool Junction
5. Lily Daly, Hastings St. Cecilia
6. Madison Shaw, Sandy Creek
7. Angela Frick, North Central
8. Emma Kennedy, Ainsworth
9. Lilly Harris, Homer
10. Corbett Lanum, Omaha Brownell-Talbot
11. Emery Vargas, Hastings St. Cecilia
12. Leah Dawson, McCool Junction
13. Isabelle Peters, Tri County
14. Dakota Horstman, Hemingford
15. Peyton Paxton, Mullen
Click to expand...

Other Sports XC Rankings (10/8)

A
CLASS C

BOYS
1. Gothenburg
2. Aurora
3. Syracuse
4. Holdrege
5. Minden
6. Lincoln Christian
7. Palmyra
8t. Fort Calhoun
8t. Wayne
10. Lincoln Lutheran

1. Tyler Hetz, Gothenburg
2. Trevin Opp, Lincoln Christian
3. Avery Carter, Milford
4. Charles Evans, Aurora
5. Payton Day, Omaha Concordia
6. Kolby Tighe, Arlington
7. Miles Clausen, Battle Creek
8. Samuel McQuistan, Holdrege
9. Bryson Neels, Gothenburg
10. Brier Cerny, North Bend
11. Haven Hauxwell, Chase County
12. Dayton Graves, Syracuse
13. Jayden Slagle, Aurora
14. Elijah Polard, Ord
15. Gannon Hubbard, Palmyra

=======================

GIRLS
1. Columbus Scotus
2. Auburn
3. Minden
4. Aurora
5. Gothenburg
6. Kearney Catholic
7. Adams Central
8. Arlington
9. Wahoo
10. Boone Central

1. Hailey O'Daniel, Arlington
2. Alexis Ericksen, Aurora
3. Scout Bell, Gothenburg
4. Avery Heinrich, Columbus Scotus
5. Brenna Benjamin, Holdrege
6. Liston Crotty, Auburn
7. Jaelyn Witter, Kearney Catholic
8. Hannah Heinrich, Columbus Scotus
9. Autumn Gasper, Boone Central
10. Sawyer Benne, Lincoln Lutheran
11. Emilyn Kavan, Columbus Scotus
12. Olivia Crotty, Auburn
13. Emma Williams, North Bend
14. Aclynn Osterbuhr, Minden
15. Alexa Warner, Minden
Click to expand...

Other Sports XC Rankings (10/8)

A
CLASS B

BOYS
1. Lincoln Pius X
2. Omaha Skutt
3. Plattsmouth
4. Gretna
5. Elkhorn Mt. Michael
6. Hastings
7. Beatrice
8. Elkhorn
9. Lexington
10. Norris

1. Braden Lofquest, Gretna East
2. Austin Carrera, Hastings
3. Tommy Rice, Omaha Skutt
4. David Krier, Lincoln Pius X
5. Joe Majerus, Lincoln Pius X
6. Josiah Quinones, Beatrice
7. Lincoln Wolfe, Omaha Skutt
8. Jared Schroeder, Waverly
9. Samuel Robinson, Norris
10. I. Portillo-Munoz, Lexington
11. Lucas Frazier, Beatrice
12. Axton Stone, Gering
13. Trevor Zurn, Alliance
14. Caleb Larsen, Gretna
15. Nolan Albers, Hastings

======================

GIRLS
1. Elkhorn North
2. Norris
3. Lincoln Pius X
4. Seward
5. Omaha Skutt
6. Gretna
7. Omaha Duchesne
8. Bennington
9. Blair
10. Hastings

1. Leah Robinson, Elkhorn North
2. Kendall Zavala, Norris
3. Atlee Wallman, Norris
4. Annah Perdue, York
5. Sophia Reynolds, Hastings
6. Kailey O'Brien, Elkhorn North
7. Paityn Christoffels, Elkhorn North
8. Malia Woosley, Lincoln Pius X
9. Mallory Robbins, Plattsmouth
10. Lydia Stewart, Platteview
11. Lydia Dominy, Norris
12. Avery Melendrez, Elkhorn North
13. Anna Ripley, Elkhorn North
14. Cece Kramper, Omaha Duchesne
15. Amalia Doty, Omaha Gross
Click to expand...

Other Sports XC Rankings (10/8)

A
Individual rankings courtesy Prep Running Nerd. Team rankings courtesy Nebraska XC Coaches Association

CLASS A

BOYS
1. Fremont
2. Lincoln North Star
3. Papillion-LaVista South
4. Lincoln East
5. Millard West
6. Lincoln Southwest
7. Omaha Westside
8. North Platte
9. Omaha Creighton Prep
10. Millard North

1. Juan Gonzalez, Fremont
2. Josiah Bitker, Lincoln North Star
3. Easton Zastrow, Lincoln North Star
4. Conor Gross, Omaha Westside
5. Noah Miller, Fremont
6. Ryan Kugler, Omaha Westside
7. Kaden Boltz, Grand Island
8. J'Shawn Afuh, Lincoln North Star
9. Tyler Smith, Lincoln North Star
10. Michael Jones, Millard West
11. Caleb Ruch, Lincoln East
12. Jack Knapp, North Platte
13. Mason Nau, Fremont
14. Noah Ryan, Papillion-LaVista South
15. Ben Schlegelmilch, Lincoln East

===========================

GIRLS
1. Millard West
2. Lincoln Southwest
3. Kearney
4. Omaha Marian
5. Papillion-LaVista
6. Papillion-LaVista South
7. Lincoln East
8. Elkhorn South
9. Norfolk
10. Millard South

1. Kate Ebmeier, Millard West
2. Abigail Burger, Kearney
3. Mabel Henningsen, Omaha Marian
4. Abbi Durow, Millard South
5. Meredith Marsh, Lincoln Southwest
6. Grace Volzke, Elkhorn South
7. Tatum Nielson, Bellevue West
8. Hope Riedel, Lincoln North Star
9. Marissa Garcia, Papillion-LaVista South
10. Hannah Soucie, Lincoln Southwest
11. Litzey Fredette, Millard West
12. Sadie Osher, Millard West
13. Kori McClain, North Platte
14. Lalya Phillips, Papillion-LaVista
15. Alexis Chadek, Papillion-LaVista
Click to expand...

Volleyball Rankings (10/8)

A
Composite rankings

CLASS A
1Papillion-LaVista South (4)(21-3)40 pts
2Omaha Westside(18-3)36
3Millard West(18-7)30
4Lincoln Southwest(12-6)24
5Fremont(19-3)21
6Elkhorn South(18-7)20
7Grand Island(18-6)17
8Millard North(13-9)16
9Omaha Marian(19-10)10
10TColumbus(17-6)3
10TLincoln North Star(13-11)3

Contenders
(none)

======================

CLASS B
1Omaha Skutt (4)(19-6)40 pts
2Norris(23-1)36
3Elkhorn North(18-6)32
4Waverly(20-6)25
5Seward(19-3)20
6TBennington(13-7)19
6TGretna East(22-6)19
8Gretna(18-13)13
9Lincoln Pius X(10-19)8
10TGrand Island Northwest(18-8)4
10TYork(16-7)4

Contenders
(none)

======================

CLASS C1
1Minden (4)(25-0)40 pts
2Clarkson/Leigh(21-2)35
3Columbus Scotus(16-4)29
4Pierce(17-4)25
5Battle Creek(18-5)24
6Kearney Catholic(14-4)19
7Laurel-Concord-Coleridge(19-2)16
8Holdrege(12-2)11
9Columbus Lakeview(13-7)10
10TMilford(12-5)4
10TOgallala(18-5)4

Contenders
David City (15-7) - 2
Wahoo (12-6) - 1

======================

CLASS C2
1Lincoln Lutheran (4)(20-2)40 pts
2Yutan(20-0)35
3Oakland-Craig(21-4)32
4Freeman(20-1)26
5Norfolk Catholic(16-3)23
6Humphrey/Lindsay Academy(20-3)19
7Thayer Central(17-0)16
8Hastings St. Cecilia(19-4)7
9Johnson-Brock(17-5)6
10TCrofton(14-5)5
10TElgin/Elgin Pope John(16-3)5

Contenders
Fremont Bergan (19-7) - 3
Wahoo Neumann (15-8) - 3

======================

CLASS D1
1Southwest (4)(21-0)40 pts
2Superior(19-5)34
3Bruning-Davenport/Shickley(12-3)33
4Kenesaw(18-5)27
5Ansley/Litchfield(15-6)20
6Brady(14-6)18
7Howells-Dodge(14-6)14
8Nebraska Christian(13-8)8
9Tri County(16-8)7
10Diller-Odell(13-8)6

Contenders
Weeping Water (14-9) - 5
Alma (16-7) - 4
Pleasanton (12-6) - 3
Cambridge (13-7) - 1

======================

CLASS D2
1Shelton (2)(18-2)38 pts
2Overton (1)(18-4)35
3Leyton (1)(24-0)32
4Amherst(17-5)27
5Central Valley(12-4)24
6Sumner-Eddvyille-Miller(15-4)21
7Stuart (18-3)19
8Meridian(11-5)10
9Loomis(14-6)9
10Garden County(16-3)3

Contenders
O'Neill St. Mary's (12-3) - 2
Click to expand...
Load more
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back